Orienting wind turbines slightly away from oncoming wind keeps their wake from interfering with the output of other turbines. This was known, but the first real-world test of this idea shows how much it can boost the combined output of wind turbines.
Coral reefs near islands with thriving seabird colonies may recover more quickly from climate change-induced die-offs, making the protection of these imperiled birds a practical strategy for reef protection, too.
Researchers have discovered a gene that could make plants grow deeper root systems, equipping them not only to cope with drier climates, but also to store more carbon.
Climate change messaging has an apocalypse problem by Ted Nordhaus
How blockchain could help democratize energy markets by Katharine Gammon
Evolution is trickier, far more intricate, than we had realized. by David Quammen
Trying to make nature valuable has had a disappointing track record by R. David Simpson
Do plastic bag bans make a difference? by Pierre-Olivier Roy
Back Issues >>
What if evolution isn’t linear, as Charles Darwin proposed when he first sketched the tree of life?
Amphibious architecture responds to floods like ships to a rising tide, floating on the water’s surface.
The godlike powers of geoengineering irrevocably change the human’s relationship with Planet Earth.
What is the optimal rollout of carbon taxes and research subsidies to speed up the transition to a low-carbon economy?
Welcome to the brave new world of artificial intelligence for conservation.
The rise of fast fashion and the technology that needs to change to keep your clothes out of the garbage.
Some economies may be quietly, and surprisingly approaching a phenomenon economists call “peak stuff.
What if we could transform cement from a climate wrecker into a carbon sponge?
The climate change apocalypse problem
The word “anthropocene” has become the closest thing there is to common shorthand for this turbulent, momentous, unpredictable, hopeless, hopeful time—duration and scope still unknown
How might science fiction constructively contribute to the Human Age?
Anthropocene is reader-supported journalism. That means that a significant portion of our operating costs comes from people like you—that is people who believe that it is time to start talking about environmental solutions, not just problems. Membership comes with benefits including high-end print editions, conversations with authors, and networking opportunities.
We pore through stacks of peer-reviewed journals so you don’t have to. Our Daily Science posts provide short, sharp summaries of the most compelling sustainability science research from around the world—a compendium found nowhere else.
Organizations and businesses can support independent reporting within an editorial beat, such as climate, health, biodiversity, and cities.
Anthropocene is a publication of
Funding is provided by the National Science Foundation along with a worldwide network of supporting members. Anthropocene editorial offices are based at the U.S. Future Earth Hub at University of Colorado, Boulder and Colorado State University.