Nonprofit journalism dedicated to creating a Human Age we actually want to live in.


To know the true carbon footprint of shrimp and cattle, think of mangroves

When mangrove deforestation is factored into the carbon equation, the global warming impact of a shrimp cocktail and a steak is similar to that of driving a fuel-efficient vehicle from Los Angeles to New York City.
April 21, 2017

Let the best of Anthropocene come to you.

Two ubiquitous food products—shrimp and beef—are releasing unprecedented amounts of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, via the clear-cutting of tropical mangrove forests, says an international group of researchers. This should push us to re-evaluate the true carbon footprint of these two foods, they say.

In their natural state, mangroves—which grow along tropical coastlines in salty and brackish intertidal zones—sequester huge amounts of carbon in the undisturbed, silty soils where they take root. Oftentimes, that carbon has been trapped in the soil for several thousand years. But encroaching agriculture, logging, and urbanization are felling these watery forests at a rate of one percent per year, causing the release of massive amounts of carbon dioxide.

In tropical regions, the rampant spread of inland shrimp ponds and beef pastures, in particular, is having the worst effects.

Writing in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, the researchers wanted to highlight the true deforestation costs of these products, something that’s frequently overlooked in impact estimates of the food we consume.

Working in five countries—Mexico, Honduras, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, and Indonesia—they took soil samples from 30 intact mangrove forests and 21 adjacent pieces of land that had been converted into shrimp ponds and cattle pastures. They also factored in the longevity and overall productivity of these farmed plots over time.

When they compared the carbon readings from intact mangrove forest to those of the converted land, they found a striking difference: shrimp farms on average had 54 percent less stored carbon; the cattle pastures contained on average 60 percent less carbon than the original mangrove forest they had replaced.

Recommended Reading:
Confirmed. Most robust evidence yet that plant-based diets protect both human and planetary health  

A finer-grained analysis translated this into 1,440 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent released into the atmosphere for every kilo of beef produced on the converted land. For shrimp, that figure was 1,603 kilograms. What’s more, beef and shrimp farming in these regions aren’t typically very productive—yet the environmental costs are still high.

To bring that home for the consumer, the researchers scaled it down to the equivalent of a plate of food. “A typical steak and shrimp cocktail dinner would burden the atmosphere with 816 kg [of carbon dioxide equivalent],” they explained. “This is approximately the same quantity of [greenhouse gases] produced by driving a fuel-efficient automobile from Los Angeles to New York City.”

Compared to studies that haven’t taken land-use change into account when measuring the impact of beef and shrimp, these impact estimates are much, much higher. The researchers point out the worrying inference: by neglecting to factor in the massive carbon footprint associated with forest conversion, we’re underestimating the real impact of food—especially that which is produced in tropical regions where forest ecosystems are being destroyed at a rapid rate.

Source: Kauffman et al. “The jumbo carbon footprint of a shrimp: carbon losses from mangrove deforestation.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2017.
Image via Flickr

Our work is available free of charge and advertising. We rely on readers like you to keep going. Donate Today

What to Read Next

Anthropocene Magazine Logo

Get the latest sustainability science delivered to your inbox every week


You have successfully signed up

Share This

Share This Article