Nonprofit journalism dedicated to creating a Human Age we actually want to live in.


What’s the best way to lock up carbon emissions—and make money doing it?

A study analyzes ten pathways that use carbon dioxide for valuable products to assess which ones also help remove the greenhouse gas to combat climate change.
December 12, 2019

Let the best of Anthropocene come to you.

Fuels, cement, and plastics are just a few products that can be made with carbon dioxide. But not all these products are made equal when it comes to climate benefits. A study published in Nature scrutinizes various pathways to use carbon dioxide to assess which ones give valuable products while helping mitigate climate change by locking away the greenhouse gas.

The international team of researchers behind the study weighed the costs, benefits and climate-fighting potential of ten different pathways or technologies to capture and utilize carbon dioxide. The CO2 could be captured from burning fossil fuels, directly from the atmosphere, or biologically sequestered.

The ten pathways include CO2-based chemical products like polymers; CO2-based fuels; microalgae fuels and products; concrete; CO2-enhanced oil recovery; bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS); mineralization of atmospheric CO2; reforestation or sustainable forestry; soil carbon sequestration techniques; and biochar.

Just because a pathway utilizes CO2 that does not mean all that CO2 is being stored or removed so it isn’t necessarily combating climate change, the researchers caution. Fuels and microalgae, for instance, have nearly no removal potential because when they are used, the greenhouse gas ends up back in the atmosphere. Concrete and wood, on the other hand, can sequester CO2 for the long term. The five land-based biological pathways offer the biggest long-term opportunity to remove and store carbon dioxide.

On average, each pathway could store or remove around 0.5 gigatonnes of CO2 per year, the authors found. And they suggest that a price on carbon emissions of less than $100 a tonne would incentivize over 1.5 gigatonnes of carbon capture.

Recommended Reading:
Enzyme found in laundry detergent could help recycle plastic

There is no silver bullet, of course. Each pathway faces its own technological, policy and economic challenge. “Greenhouse gas removal is essential to achieve net zero carbon emissions and stabilize the climate,” said Cameron Hepburn, professor of environmental economics at the University of Oxford. “The promise of CO2 utilization is that it could act as an incentive for CO2 removal and could reduce emissions by displacing fossil fuels. Policymakers need to think like investors and fund a portfolio of options.”

Source: Cameron Hepburn et al. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature, 2019.


Our work is available free of charge and advertising. We rely on readers like you to keep going. Donate Today

What to Read Next

Anthropocene Magazine Logo

Get the latest sustainability science delivered to your inbox every week


You have successfully signed up

Share This

Share This Article