Using seawater for cooling could be a sustainable option
Researchers found that just one cubic meter of seawater has the same cooling energy as a solar farm the size of 68 football fields—or 21 wind turbines.
October 29, 2020

The past five years have seen the hottest average global temperatures on record. As the world warms rapidly, use of air-conditioning is rising. And with that are planet-warming carbon emissions, since cooling technologies gobble immense amounts of electricity.

A new study now assesses the possibility of using seawater for cooling as a sustainable option. In addition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, simple design changes could boost cooling capacity at a small additional cost, according to researchers who published their work in the journal Energy Efficiency. This could open up markets further away from the coast.

Seawater air-conditioning [SWAC], which was first proposed in the 1970s but gained traction in the 90s, involves pumping cold water from oceans at depths of below 700 meters and temperatures of 3 to 5 degrees Celsius to the coast, where it can be used in cooling systems to produce cold air for buildings. The warmer water is returned to the ocean.

The technology has been implemented on some tropical islands where water does not have to be pumped long distances, and where cooling needs and energy costs are high. While the initial capital cost of building SWAC systems is higher, energy costs to run it are low. The exact opposite is true of conventional air-conditioning.

In the new paper, the researchers propose a relatively simple tweak to conventional designs that can increase the efficiency of SWAC projects with long pipelines as well as make them easier to expand to meet growing cooling demand. Their idea involves increasing the excavation depth of the seawater pump station up to 20m below the sea level, compared to 2–5 m in conventional projects.

Discover more:  Maybe the solution to climate change is self-interest among nations

The deeper pump doubles the speed of the inlet pipeline seawater and hence the cooling power, for only 55 percent more capital cost. The inlet and outlet pipelines, which are a significant cost of a project, do not need to be changed. “The proposed design configuration allows SWAC projects to be built with an initial cooling load that guarantees the contracted cooling demand for customers that are willing to invest in the technology,” the authors write. Then, as others get interested, builders can expand the cooling power modularly with smaller additional capital costs. This reduces the overall project implementation cost and risks, they say.

The team also assessed the feasibility of using seawater cooling with energy storage and explored the synergy of such systems with renewable solar and wind energy sources. When electricity costs and cooling demand are low, excess renewable electricity could be used to pump cold seawater into thermal storage tanks, which could be used to meet cooling demand later when needed. For longer-term seasonal storage, cold pumped seawater could be used to freeze freshwater in the storage tanks. Then, when cooling demand is high, both the seawater air-conditioning system and the energy stored as ice could meet cooling needs.

Source: Julian David Hunt et al. High velocity seawater air-conditioning with thermal energy storage and its operation with intermittent renewable energies. Energy Efficiency, 2020.

Image: The ocean room by dandelionchronicles

All Donations Doubled from Now until Dec 31

Smart, powerful environmental journalism doesn't come cheap. Anthropocene is science-based, nonprofit—and reader-funded. 

Yes, Count Me In!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This Article