DAILY SCIENCE

Which European political parties have the most ambitious climate policies?
Spoiler: They are surprisingly similar in ambition—but they also all share the same blind spot.
October 27, 2020

Different political parties have different ideas about the relationship between humans and nature, between governments and markets, and so on—that’s what gives rise to different political parties, after all. But in Europe, parties across the political spectrum have converged on surprisingly similar decarbonization goals, a new study shows.

Researchers combed through government and opposition party climate and energy policies in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain—the European Union’s four largest electricity markets, which together account for 60% of EU power demand.

“Discussions and debates on how to best decarbonize energy and electricity can be expected to reflect ideological positions,” the researchers write in the journal Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. For example, European conservative and social democratic parties tend to advocate a state-centered, centralized approach to policy, liberal parties a market-centered approach, and leftist and green parties a localized, grassroots approach.

The researchers thought these differences would lead to markedly different ideas about how to carry out decarbonization: for example, they thought green parties would prioritize fast decarbonization, liberal parties cost containment and a hands-off, let-the-markets-decide ethos, and conservative and social democratic parties reliability of energy supply leading to a slow, cautious approach to decarbonization.

But in fact, parties across the political spectrum in these four countries have similar ambitions for decarbonization and expansion of renewable energy. All policies envision carbon emissions from the power system 21-55% below 1990 levels by 2030, and 75-100% lower by 2050.

The differences between plans don’t map very strongly to ideology, but rather to timing (more recently formulated policies tend to prescribe deeper decarbonization) or to the particularities of different countries (political parties in France, where there’s a strong supply of carbon-free nuclear power, do not prioritize rolling out renewable energy to the same degree as those in Germany).

The party positions jibe with those of regular citizens in Germany and Spain, the researchers found when they analyzed 2019 polling data from these two countries. These data show strong support across the political spectrum—albeit slightly higher among those on the political left than on the right—for both decarbonization and renewable energy expansion.

Discover more:  First comprehensive study of indoor pot farm emissions uncovers a giant climate hot spot

For example, in Spain 93% of the survey’s 1,000 participants said they support planned legislation that addresses climate change and the energy transition. This includes 98% of those on the left and 84% of those on the right. And 87% of Spaniards, including 91% on the left and 81% on the right, support a fully renewable power system.

In Germany, 87% of the more than 6,000 survey respondents said they support continued promotion and expansion of renewable energy. Again this support is consistent across the political spectrum, with the exception of supporters of Alternative for Germany (AfD), a right-wing populist party.

Because there’s broad consensus for decarbonization and renewables among political parties and the citizenry as a whole, the researchers argue, any change of government in these European countries is unlikely to knock the energy transition off track. That’s the reassuring news.

What’s more worrisome is that no one seems to be thinking about how to overcome a key downside of renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Because these renewable power sources are intermittent, switching over to them requires planning for how to keep the lights on consistently.

“However, whereas political positions on phasing out fossil fuel power are clear across the policy space, positions on phasing in new flexibility options to balance intermittent renewables are vague or non-existent,” the researchers write. Neither governments nor opposition parties have this problem on their agenda, and the polling data show less support for possible solutions than for renewables overall.

Although parties “agree on the need to scale up fluctuating renewables and phase out fossil fuels, there is a risk of a future flexibility gap in all investigated countries—which, in turn, could threaten the further progress toward the renewables and decarbonization targets,” the researchers write.

Source: Thonig R. et al.Does ideology influence the ambition level of climate and renewable energy policy? Insights from four European countries.” Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2020.

Image: ©Anthropocene

What to Read Next

Get the latest sustainability science delivered to your inbox every week

Newsletters

You have successfully signed up

Share This Article