Nonprofit journalism dedicated to creating a Human Age we actually want to live in.

Note: This article is from Conservation Magazine, the precursor to Anthropocene Magazine. The full 14-year Conservation Magazine archive is now available here.

Exotic Herbivores Promote Plant Invasions

July 29, 2008

Invasive plants are thought to be so successful because they don’t have natural enemies in their new homes. But new research suggests that the opposite is true. “Exotic plants may thrive not by escaping their native enemies, but by following them,” say John Parker and two coauthors in Science.

The researchers made this discovery by examining from a new angle how herbivores affect invasive plants. Rather than focusing on insect herbivores that favor particular plants, they considered a wide range of herbivores that eat a wide range of plants. The researchers analyzed more than 60 existing studies of how excluding herbivores affected plants. The studies included more than 100 species of exotic plants in habitats ranging from grasslands to forests to lake bottoms, and the herbivores included both natives—from bison to wallabies to fish—and nonnatives—from cattle to rabbits to mollusks.

The results showed that exotic plants are promoted by exotic herbivores and suppressed by native herbivores. Exotic herbivores increase the relative abundance of exotic plants by nearly two-thirds (from about 24 percent when excluded to 40 percent when present), whereas native herbivores decrease the relative abundance of exotic plants by more than one-fourth (from about 37 percent when excluded to 27 percent when present). Overall, the relative abundance of exotic plants was more than 50 percent higher with exotic than with native herbivores (about 40 percent vs. 27 percent, respectively). Moreover, exotic herbivores increase the diversity of exotic plants by one-third (from an average of about 4.8 species when excluded to about 6.4 species when present).

Just as native herbivores suppress exotic plants, exotic herbivores suppress native plants. For example, the cover of native plants was about one-third less when exotic herbivores were present than when they were excluded (37 percent vs. 53 percent, respectively). These findings can be explained by the same underlying cause. In both cases, the herbivores are novel enemies to the plants. In turn, this explains why exotic herbivores don’t suppress invasive plants. Because most invasive plants came from the same places as the exotic herbivores, these herbivores are not novel enemies of the plants. Rather, the invasive plants are already adapted to the exotic herbivores. This conclusion is supported by the studies analyzed: nearly 90 percent of the exotic plants of known origin came from the same region as the exotic herbivores considered.

This work suggests that eradicating exotic herbivores and restoring native generalist herbivores could help control and prevent plant invasions. Moreover, this work provides a solution to the long-standing mystery of why so many plants have invaded the New World from the Old World but not the other way around. The introduction of herbivores has likewise been largely one-way, with Europeans bringing livestock and game animals wherever they went. Moreover, these Old World herbivores have essentially replaced native herbivores in much of the Americas and in Australia and New Zealand, from bison and elk to kangaroos and moas. “Exotic generalist herbivores decimated native, New World plants and paved the way for invasions of Old World plants that were adapted to these herbivores,” says Parker, who did this work while at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta and is now at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.

By Robin Meadows

What to Read Next